Of course the world is flat
and ebooks are finished
THE
flat-earth priests from the Wall Street Journal have joined their counterparts on
The Guardian in pre-emptively performing the last rites on ebooks.
Nicholas
Carr in a recent WSJ article made this quite extraordinary prediction:
…‘the initial e-book
explosion is starting to look like an aberration.
‘….E-books, in other
words, may turn out to be just another format—an even lighter-weight, more
disposable paperback.’
Of course, the WSJ lives
and breathes hallowed statistics and this is what Carr’s argument rests on.
‘Sales of e-readers
plunged 36% in 2012, according to estimates from IHS iSuppli, while tablet
sales exploded.’
As with much internet
news, you get the opinionated background in the main piece and the real story,
succinctly put, in the comments.
In this case, Michael
Fawkes wrote:
‘The 36% reduction in stand-alone e-readers is
irrelevant. The question is how many e-book reading devices (including tablets)
were sold in 2013?’
Major etailers such as
Amazon and Barnes and Noble this year made FREE ereader apps readily available
for tablets and smart phones. In other words tablets (with explosive sales) became
ereaders as well as retaining other functions.
Carr admits ebook
sales increased by a third last year but he puts it in such a convoluted way it
sounds like failure.
‘…the annual growth rate for e-book sales fell
abruptly during 2012, to about 34%.’
Bugger me, the industry is in crisis because ‘it is a sharp decline from the triple-digit growth rates of the preceding four years.'
Bugger me, the industry is in crisis because ‘it is a sharp decline from the triple-digit growth rates of the preceding four years.'
Most industries would kill for a 30+% sales increase. I still completely agree with the prediction of Joe Konrath and others that print books are the ones headed for a niche in book sales.
There is a problem with real ebooks (to distinguish them from dead-tree books) but it is not about the cliché Carr recites: ‘The fact that an e-book can't be sold or given away after it's read also reduces the perceived value of the product.’
There is a problem with real ebooks (to distinguish them from dead-tree books) but it is not about the cliché Carr recites: ‘The fact that an e-book can't be sold or given away after it's read also reduces the perceived value of the product.’
The ebook critics like to toss around that one about pass-ons because they know the ebook commercial model cannot sustain private lending in the digital world. But the fact is being able to pass on a dead-tree book barely informs the reader's buying decision.
Commenter Steve Shelton nailed the real problem with ebooks. ‘I prefer printed books because I have found so many spelling and formatting errors in e-books.’
Commenter Steve Shelton nailed the real problem with ebooks. ‘I prefer printed books because I have found so many spelling and formatting errors in e-books.’
That is it in a nutshell.
Publishers are using automated programs to create books for eReaders and the programs
just do not work properly. This is a technical problem which will soon be
solved as with the header/ footer and page numbering omissions.
When these drawbacks
are overcome and a cheap dedicated 6in X 9 inch ereader, capable of storing 1000
books is created, we will all want one.
Move on, Mr Carr. Run
if you will.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQIrI3N1bQQ
No comments:
Post a Comment